Main Menu
| Home |
| Radio Shows - LISTEN |
| Brad's Blog |
| Irwin's Blog |
| Brad In the Media |
| Irwin in the Media |
| Bridges TV - WATCH |
| Podcast |
| Forum |
Movies
Building Bridges: Abrahamic Perspectives on the World Today
with Rabbi Brad Hirschfield, Season II
Now Available on a 3-DVD Set
A first-ever 15-part series conceived by a rabbi for Bridges TV-American Muslim TV Network, the show brings together religious leaders of the three major Abrahamic faiths to grapple with the divisive issues splitting our traditions and country. Fast paced and tied to today's news, it gives viewers a deeper understanding of how people of faith see the world, and each other, with live interviews from the American public.
Price: $25.00 (3 DVD Set)
To order, click here.
Members Login
Hirschfield & Kula and
IntelligentTalkRadio.com
is produced and managed by
Scott Newman Productions
| Irwin Blog Aug 13, 2007 |
|
|
| Wednesday, 15 August 2007 | |
|
A Necessary Tension!
by Irwin Kula
Like many contemporary ethical dilemmas revolving around religion, this question pitting patients’ interests against religious conviction presumes a fault line or dualism, characteristic of modernity, which has now led us into what T. S. Eliot called a wasteland. It is hard to believe that just a few hundred years ago the great philosophers, theologians and religious figures like Maimonides were also the era’s greatest doctors. And it would have been unimaginable to them that patients’ interests (to be cured) and God’s desires (to choose life) could conflict. No wonder, that well into this century, this sensibility was expressed by many like my grandparents who saw doctors as gods!
The explosive advances in medicine since the enlightenment were to a great extent dependent on the differentiation (Kant) between the knowledge spheres of science and religion, and the emergence of scientific and empirical methods to study the body. This healthy differentiation became, over the centuries, an unhealthy separation and even antagonism between medicine and religion with the unfortunate consequence of medicine seemingly always associated with pushing the limits (a good thing) and religion seemingly always being associated with holding the line (a bad thing). The fact that this question feels so pressing reflects the failure of both physicians and religious leadership to understand their respective expertise’s, roles, limits, and to ultimately see the patient as a whole human being. One can already hear the reaction to this question in our polarized public culture. Our secular fundamentalists, certain of the primitive and backwardness of all religion, are outraged at the very thought that a physician would have religious convictions yet alone that such convictions could possibly come into conflict with a patient’s interest. On the other side, our religious fundamentalists are equally horrified having to defend “God’s objective Truth” against physicians recklessly taking life into their own hands. If our choice is between religious fundamentalists who know exactly what the God in whom they believe wants them to do and secular fundamentalists who are just as certain about their truth then the only thing for sure is that patients interests will not be maximally perceived yet alone honored. Obviously, legally, in our country, a physician’s primary responsibility is to a patients well being as understood by contemporary medical ethical standards (e.g. AMA) and not to any particular religious conviction. This is no different than a fireman’s primary responsibility to save people from a burning building regardless of any conflict with his religious convictions. But what this question is actually getting at is a psycho-spiritual tension that is crucial to keep alive in our medical and religious communities as well as our broader culture. The term “religious conviction”, as it is used pitted against patient’s interest, describes an inner experience that any ethically and morally sensitive doctor needs to cultivate and be ever sensitive to. There are times when a physician ought to feel a stirring, an anxiousness, an unease, a disquieting sense - a signal of transcendence if one is “religious” and immanence if one is “secular” – that medical tradition, precedent, and protocol as inherited, learned, and practiced is not in one’s patient’s interests and that some deeper, more inclusive, intuition, sensibility and awareness that comes from outside of one’s medical comfort zone needs to be brought to bear on the situation. Any doctor who is never open to this inner dissonance is one who, whether religious or not, is guilty of hubris and by definition can not have his patients interests maximally in mind and therefore is not genuinely living up to the sacred calling of doctor. By the same token, “patients interests”, as it is used pitted against religious convictions, describes an inner experience that any ethically and morally sensitive religious person needs to cultivate and be ever sensitive to. There are times when a deeply religious person ought to feel a stirring, an anxiousness, an unease, a disquieting sense - a signal of transcendence if one is “traditionally religious” and immanence if one is “ a religious humanist” – that religious tradition, creed and precedent as inherited, learned, and practiced is not in one’s patient’s interests and that some deeper, more inclusive, intuition, sensibility and awareness that comes from outside of one’s religious comfort zone needs to be brought to bear on the situation. Any religious person who is never open to this inner dissonance is one who, whether traditional or not, is guilty of hubris, and by definition can not have God’s desires/interests maximally in mind and therefore is not genuinely living up to being a religious person. Precisely at this moment in my life my brother-in-law, a wonderful doctor, and I, a rabbi, are each feeling this tension from our respective traditions as our father-in-law, who we both deeply love, suffers from pancreatic cancer. We have reached a point – which admittedly is different for each person – where we honestly feel the limits of our own traditions (medical and religious) to be simply offered as the way to deal with the present moment. Neither one of us can hide behind the certainty of the terms “patient interests” or “religious conviction”. For us, the question of patient’s interests versus religious conviction has dissolved in a humility that needs to be at the core of great medicine and great religion all along the way. When that happens the tension between patients interests and religious conviction is a guarantee that the person being cared for becomes a whole human being. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
| Feb 2010 - Present |
|
Fox Forum, FoxNews.com, “Why god is Dead at the Supreme Court” , 5/13/10
Lars Larson Show (Compass Media), Elena Kagan and a Protestant-Free Court, 5/11/10
WFTL Morning News with Russ Morley (Southern Florida), National Day of Prayer 5/6/10 Lars Larson Show, Former President Bill Clinton, the Tea Party, and freedom and responsible discourse, 4/19/10
The Morning News, WFTL (South Florida), Christians Making Seders (scroll down to no. 24), 3/30/10
Beliefnet.com, How to Be Free: Passover Lessons (10 Tips from Brad Hirschfield), 3/25/10 The Busted Halo, Sirius XM Radio, Passover/Easter, 3/24/10 The Al Gainey Show, WDUN (Northern Georgia), "Under God", 3/22/10 Politics Daily, "Under God", 3/20/10
Aaron in the Afternoons, KLFD (St. Cloud, MN), Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, 3/16/10
Blog News Web, God, History And The Texas Public Schools: A Debate That Impacts All Of Us, 3/12/10
The Morning Show with Russ Morley, (WFTL, Miami), The Academy Awards and our National Obsession with Celebrities (Click on no. 16), 3/8/10
The Huffington Post, Purim, 2/27/10
The Al Gainey Show, WDUN (Northern GA), CPAC Conference - Young people who are conservative seem less attached to some social issues than their older religious counterparts, 2/26/10 Andrew Sullivan, The Daily Dish, 2/25/10
The God Show, KTAR (Phoenix), Sacred Super Bowl Sunday, 2/7/10
The Lars Larson Show, Compass Media Networks, Sacred Super Bowl Sunday, 2/5/10
|
| Feb 2010 - Present |
|
The Mike Newcomb Show, KPHX (Phoenix), Technology’s Impact on Religion, 5/6/10
At Issue With Ben Merens, WPR, Holocaust memory: How do we remember when the survivors are gone?, 4/20/10
The Mike Newcomb Show, KPHX (Phoenix), Tax Day and people’s distrust of the government, (interview begins half way in), 4/15/10
The Lars Larson Show, Compass Media Networks, Paying Taxes: Toxic or Transformative?, 4/15/10 The Mike Newcomb Show, KPHX (Phoenix), Paying Taxes: Toxic or Transformative?, 4/15/10 Aaron in the Afternoon, KLFD, St. Cloud, MN, Paying Taxes: Toxic or Transformative?, 4/14/10 What’s Cookin’ Today with Erik and Jack, Cable Radio Network, Paying Taxes: Toxic or Transformative?, 4/14/10
State of Belief, Air America, Paying Taxes: Toxic or Transformative?, (From 10:12-17:14), 4/10-11/10
Huffington Post, Religion: Nothing More than Politics in Drag, 4/7/10 Religious Themes in Film at the Hudson Union Society, "Harold Ramis talks about the hunger for wisdom in film, and refers to his ‘favorite Rabbi’, Rabbi Irwin Kula..." 4/7/10
“God Talk,” A Segment on the Fox News web show, “The Strategy Room,” 2/26/10
The Forward, Being Jewish in NY, 2/17/10
Politics Daily, Is Obama Appointee Harry Knox an 'Anti-Catholic Bigot'? , 2/12/10
Erik and Jack Attack, Cable Radio Network, Valentine’s Day - (Tuesday, Time code: 19:47-23:34), 2/9/10
Aaron in the Afternoon, KLFD, (ST. Cloud, MN), Valentine’s Day, 2/9/10
NY Jewish Week, Voodoo Dialogue, 2/3/10
FoxNews.com “Strategy Room”, Relationships and Valentine’s Day, 2/1/10
|